English
Spanish
Polish
Click here for more information about our labor and employment law practice. Click here to read our attorney biographies and learn about our background. Click here for the latest labor and employment law news and to subscribe to our free online newsletter. Click here to access our free online documents and helpful links. Click here for a free, anonymous online evaluation of your legal issues. Click here for our address and contact information.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”) is a federal law that was enacted in 2002, in response to a number of high-profile corporate and accounting scandals.  SOX contains eleven sections, regulating and imposing new standards on public company boards, management, and public accounting firms. 

At Caffarelli & Siegel, we primarily rely upon SOX in the context of retaliatory discharge cases.  SOX provides protection for employees who report fraudulent activity to, amongst others, their supervisors.  Under Section 1514A of the Act, an employer may not discriminate against any employee in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the employee “to provide information, cause information to be provided, or otherwise assist in an investigation regarding any conduct which the employee reasonably believes constitutes [fraudulent activity] . . . or any provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders.”

Employees will be protected if “the information or assistance is provided to or the investigation is conducted by . . . a person with supervisory authority over the employee (or such other person working for the employer who has the authority to investigate, discover, or terminate misconduct).”  In addition, the employee will be protected if information is provided to a federal regulatory or law enforcement agency, or any member of congress or congressional committee.

The Northern District of Illinois has held that to succeed on a SOX claim under Section 1514A, the claimant must establish that “(1) he engaged in protected activity; (2) the employer knew of the protected activity; (3) he suffered an unfavorable personnel action; and (4) circumstances exist to suggest that the protected activity was a contributing factor to the unfavorable action.”  Bishop v. PCS Admin. (USA), Inc., No. 05-C-5683, 2006 WL 1460032 at *1 (N.D. Ill., May 23, 2006) (citations omitted).

If an employer has violated the whistleblower protection provision of SOX, the employer may be liable to the employee for injunctive relief or front pay, back pay with interest, and special damages including mandatory attorney’s fees and costs.

If you have questions about your rights under SOX or believe that your employer may have violated the whistleblower protection provisions of the Act, contact Caffarelli & Siegel Ltd. to speak to a Chicago Employment Attorney.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Top
  Back to Resources
Login
  Disclaimer Privacy Policy Remote Webmail