| Since 2001, the attorneys at Caffarelli & Siegel have actively provided excellent legal counsel to individuals, businesses, and employers involved in a wide array of matters. The firm has successfully resolved a number of federal lawsuits, administrative agency proceedings, arbitrations, and negotiations. Names and case numbers have been redacted for confidentiality purposes. |
|
Case 09-C-x was brought in the
United States District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, by a mover for a major Chicagoland
residential moving and storage company. The opt-in
Complaint, alleging violations of the
Fair Labor Standards Act,
details the employer’s policy and practice of failing to
properly compensate employees for travel time and for
time spent in preparation for individual moving jobs.
The case is pending before Judge Hart in the district
court, and is in the beginning stages of litigation.
Case 09-C-x was brought in the
United States District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, by a former employee in the shipping and
packaging department of a large sewing machine
manufacturing company. The employee alleges that
her former employer interfered with her rights under the
Family and Medical Leave Act
(“FMLA”) and retaliated against her for pursuing a
workers compensation claim. Specifically, the
Company failed to inform the employee of her right to
leave when she injured herself in the workplace and
required either intermittent or continuous time off to
receive medical treatment for her injury. The
Company placed her on forced leave, and terminated her
employment just weeks into the leave, soon after the
Company was informed that it would be responsible for
providing workers compensation benefits. The case
is pending before Judge Aspen in the district court, and
is in the beginning stages of litigation.
Case 09-C-x was brought in the
United States District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, by a former dishwasher of a large pizza
franchise which has locations throughout
Chicago
and the Chicagoland suburbs. The former dishwasher
alleged violations of the
Fair Labor Standards Act
based upon the restaurant’s failure to pay him time
and one-half (“overtime”) for the hours he worked in
excess of forty hours in one workweek.
Specifically, the employer compensated the dishwasher at
his straight time rate for hours over forty, and paid
him in cash. The case settled to the satisfaction
of the client.
Case 09-C-x was brought in the
United States District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, by a former warehouse custodian of a sheet
metal fabrication and assembly corporation. The
Complaint alleges a violation of the
Fair Labor Standards Act
based upon the employer’s misclassification of the
warehouse custodian as “exempt” under the FLSA for the
majority of his employment. Specifically, the
Company treated the employee as a salaried and “exempt”
employee for the first fifteen years of his employment
with the Company, and paid him a constant weekly salary,
regardless of the number of hours over forty the
employee worked in one week. In early 2009, the
Company reevaluated the employee’s status and concluded
that he had always been a “non-exempt” employee,
according to the “white collar exemptions” of the FLSA.
Thereafter, the Company paid the employee an hourly rate
and provided overtime compensation to the employee for
hours worked in excess of forty in any one workweek.
The former employee seeks damages for the three years
preceding the filing of the Complaint, for the Company’s
willful failure to pay him overtime for hours worked in
excess of forty in one week. The case is pending
before Judge Lefkow in the district court, and is in the
beginning stages of litigation.
Case 09-C-x was brought in the
United States District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois, by a former import operations
representative of a national import/export corporation.
The opt-in Complaint alleges a violation of the
Fair Labor Standards Act
based upon the employer’s misclassification of
import operations representatives and account
representatives as “exempt” pursuant to the
“white-collar exemptions” of the FLSA. The named
plaintiff has sent notices of the opt-in lawsuit to all
similarly situated employees who worked for the
defendant in the past three years. The case is
pending before Judge Leinenweber in the district court,
and is in the beginning stages of litigation.
|