Case 08-C-x, brought in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, a ceiling lift installer alleged that he was
terminated in
retaliation for exercising his rights to
receive worker’s compensation benefits. The ceiling
lift installer also alleged that he and the company’s
other ceiling lift installers were misclassified as
exempt employees, and therefore entitled to unpaid
overtime. The case settled to the ceiling lift
installer’s satisfaction.
Case 08-C-x, brought in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, the director of an early childhood education
program alleged that her employer interfered with her
rights under the
Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”),
and retaliated against her for exercising her FMLA
rights. Specifically, she was discouraged from using
the entire twelve weeks of maternity leave provided for
by the FMLA, and ultimately not reinstated to her
previous position at the conclusion of her maternity
leave. The case settled to the director’s satisfaction.
Case 08-C-x, brought in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, two former employees that worked as general
laborers for Defendants were not paid their proper
wages. Specifically, the laborers installed showers and
other glass fixtures, but were not paid the required
overtime rate. Moreover, Defendants misclassified the
employees as independent contractors in order to avoid
paying them overtime and to avoid paying employment
taxes. Caffarelli & Siegel Ltd. aggressively pursued
the employees’ claims under the
Fair Labor Standards
Act, Illinois Minimum Wage Law,
Illinois Wage Payment
and Collection Act, and Illinois Employee Classification
Act, which eventually led to Defendants consenting to a
judgment against them.
Case 2008Lx, which was filed in the
Cook Country Circuit Court, a dentist alleged that her
employer breached her
employment contract by not
providing her with the required notice to terminate her
employer. She also alleged that she was terminated in
violation of the
Illinois Whistleblower Act because she
refused to provide unnecessary dental procedures to
low-income patients. The case settled to the dentist’s
satisfaction.
Case 08-C-x, a former employee of a
candy company sued his former employer for terminating
his employment for alleged absenteeism after he had
taken time off to attend to his
FMLA-qualifying medical
condition. The employer tried to claim that the
employee had not given it adequate notice that he
required leave. The case settled to the employee’s
satisfaction.
Case 08-C-x, two supermarket
employees brought claims against their former employer
for unpaid overtime wages. The case settled to the
employees’ satisfaction.
Case 08-C-x, a former employee of a
property management company sued his former employee for
unpaid overtime wages. The case settled to the
employee’s satisfaction.
Case 08-C-x, a former employee of a
painting company sued her former employer on the grounds
that she was misclassified under the
Fair Labor
Standards Act as “exempt,” and therefore that her
employer improperly failed to pay her overtime
compensation. The case settled to the employee’s
satisfaction.
Case 08-C-x, brought in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, an employee in the cleaning industry sued his
employer for violations of the
Fair Labor Standards Act
and the
Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act. The
employee was required to travel for 1-2 cumulative hours
per day between work sites, and was not compensated for
any travel time. The case settled to the client’s
satisfaction.
Cases 08-C-x and 08-C-x, brought in
the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, a number of current and former
employees sued an auto repair company for its violation
of the
Fair Labor Standards Act. The employees alleged
that the company failed to pay them
overtime for hours
worked in excess of 40 hours in one workweek. The case
settled to the clients’ satisfaction. |